August 28th, 2005pure nerd
So I snatched this from her, who, btw, is a very entertaining read.
Anyway, I knew I was a nerd… BUT, I did not know I was a pure nerd. Now that’s a bumper sticker I’d like to have. 🙂
Pure Nerd
65 % Nerd, 26% Geek, 17% DorkFor The Record:
A Nerd is someone who is passionate about learning/being smart/academia.
A Geek is someone who is passionate about some particular area or subject, often an obscure or difficult one.
A Dork is someone who has difficulty with common social expectations/interactions.You scored better than half in Nerd, earning you the title of: Pure Nerd.
The times, they are a-changing. It used to be that being exceptionally smart led to being unpopular, which would ultimately lead to picking up all of the traits and tendences associated with the “dork.” No-longer. Being smart isn’t as socially crippling as it once was, and even more so as you get older: eventually being a Pure Nerd will likely be replaced with the following label: Purely Successful.
My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
You scored higher than 71% on nerdiness
You scored higher than 26% on geekosity
You scored higher than 14% on dork points
Aren’t you folks lucky?! You know a pure nerd. 😛
Tell me something I didnt already know 😉
But this is why I love you…
Comment by Ghetto gurrl — August 28, 2005 @ 5:12 pm
I know you are spinning because I forgot the “s” in my previous comment.
Comment by Ghetto Gurrl — August 28, 2005 @ 5:14 pm
Joe Normal
39 % Nerd, 17% Geek, 26% Dork
Comment by Ghetto Gurrl — August 28, 2005 @ 5:23 pm
LOL. This is true.. and I fixed it. 😉 😛
And you’re Joe Normal?! LOL. Nice.
Get your ass over here already and quit dicking around online. 😛
Comment by the insider — August 28, 2005 @ 5:41 pm
Pure Nerd
69 % Nerd, 34% Geek, 13% Dork
Comment by grampa — August 28, 2005 @ 6:32 pm
Hmm.. you’re nerdier than I there, old timer. Must come with age. 😛
Comment by the insider — August 28, 2005 @ 7:08 pm
Ooooo, I’m linked. How special am I!
Thanks, Nerd.
Comment by HarleyWriter — August 29, 2005 @ 9:17 am
🙂 You’re very special Harley. They have special places just for people like you.. 😉
Comment by the insider — August 29, 2005 @ 9:46 am
I am:
Pure Nerd
56 % Nerd, 17% Geek, 0% Dork
😀
Comment by The Guest — August 29, 2005 @ 9:47 am
You’re 0% dork? Who’s 0% dork? You can’t play with us anymore… 😛
Comment by the insider — August 29, 2005 @ 9:51 am
Hey, I didn’t write the test.
For the record, my parents both have dorkiness in them.
HOwever, the gene that controls your dork percentage has multiple alleles with many phenotypes. Unlike other trait expression dork/nerd/geek phenotype expression is not mutually exlusive. So homozygous expression of one phenotype in parents is not always a clear indication of the expected outcome.
If simple mendelian genetics can’t figure it out, It’s unlikely a simple test could. 😛
Comment by The Guest — August 29, 2005 @ 10:54 am
Oh, you are WAY nerdier than I. Just wanted to state that for the record.
Mendelian genetics.. nerd, nerd, nerd. SUPER nerd. 😛
Comment by the insider — August 29, 2005 @ 11:00 am
Joe Normal
43 % Nerd, 8% Geek, 26% Dork
…I’ll admit, I feel a little disappointed at my result. Great test though! I’ll pass it on for sure!
Comment by Kerry — August 29, 2005 @ 2:26 pm
Normal isn’t too bad— 🙂
Comment by the insider — August 29, 2005 @ 2:27 pm
Pure nerd. You’re not getting figures. Suffice it to say even I’m ashamed. 😉
Comment by Anne — August 29, 2005 @ 2:51 pm
LOL. Love it. Come on.. share!
Does anyone else think it’s disturbing that most of the readers of this blog are pure nerds (or completely normal)? What, do we run in a pack or something?
Comment by the insider — August 29, 2005 @ 2:53 pm
I am a nerd too! Nerds rule!
: – )
Comment by Kate — August 29, 2005 @ 3:21 pm
Oh yeah, it’s official. We run in a pack.
Comment by the insider — August 29, 2005 @ 3:27 pm
We just know our own kind And we flock together.
Comment by Anne — August 29, 2005 @ 4:19 pm
Alright.. that works for me. 🙂
Comment by the insider — August 29, 2005 @ 4:23 pm